Join a jury and vote.

Earn from home, earn from phone.

It's easy. Pick a case. Vote for the solution you think is best. Earn RHUCoin.

Consensus voters share bonus pool. Suggest a new solution—earn bonus RHUCoin.

Vote in any of these simple 1-question surveys to voice your opinion and earn RHUCoin rewards. It’s easy: click the green start button for case description and ballot, examine the choices, and vote for the option you think is the best solution.

Filters
Public Consensus Opinion
Single-use plastic includes products such as straws, bags, and bottles; pretty much any plastic item that’s made for temporary use. Although we might not think much of it when we buy bottles of our favorite drink or ask for plastic bags when we’re in the checkout line at the grocery store, these choices have a serious impact on the health of our planet and ourselves.

This material involves the usage of a large amount of fossil fuels, namely crude oil, for creation and transportation. Just the manufacturing process of plastic is a huge source of pollution to the environment.

Single-use plastic doesn’t biodegrade, ever. Instead, it breaks apart into smaller pieces, never truly deteriorating. With 30 million tons of plastic discarded each year in America, there’s hardly a single place on earth that doesn’t know the touch of single-use plastic.
  • Yes. Single-use plastic should be banned, including it's production and usage.
  • Yes, but first someone need to find out the alternative to it.
  • Governments across the world should create a strict policy on how they are going to do single-use plastic waste management without affecting the environment.
  • No.
RHUCoin reward
Vote: 15 RHU
Consensus bonus: 20 RHU
Total RHUCoin pool: 1,500 RHU
Eligibility: Member of the public | Doctor (MD) | Blogger | Editor | News Anchor | Veterinarian
Poll opened: 01 Oct 2019
Poll closes: 31 Oct 2019
Current jury pool: 7
Status: Voting in progress
Public Consensus Opinion
1- Is it important for you to have active engagement in your cases? 2- To be just as much a part of your case as your lawyer is? 3- An attorney who works as your partner and shares knowledge.
  • Yes, I believe lawyers know the law indeed, but you know my matter and my market better.
  • No, I want to delegate my matter(s) and only be distrubed when truly necessary.
RHUCoin reward
Vote: 15 RHU
Consensus bonus: 20 RHU
Total RHUCoin pool: 1,500 RHU
Eligibility: Member of the public | 500 Tech Leaders member | Business owner | Members of the public, age 18 + | PeopleClaim online mediators | Possible plaintiff
Poll opened: 16 Mar 2019
Poll closes: 13 Apr 2019
Current jury pool: 104
Status: Voting in progress
Public Consensus Opinion
Description
Assuming a law firm has the components of what makes it a desirable firm - experience, tech savy, knowledge, billing transparency, and it had a service delivery feature "Interactive Client Dashboard." A dashboard, your unique username and password where:
- your law firm and you could Share files, collaborate on documents, manage approvals, and keep projects on track.
- information was at your finger tips, such as how much you have paid the lawyer in a determined period, or particular matter was segmented from the judgments you won, or contracts you signed.
- If you can leave a message, a comment for your lawyer to read next. If you could know when was the last time your lawyer opened your file? or read the document revisions you made?
RHUCoin reward
Vote: 15 RHU
Consensus bonus: 20 RHU
Total RHUCoin pool: 1,500 RHU
Eligibility: Developer | General Contrator | Store Owner | Cryptocurrency Investor | 500 Blockchain Leaders | In-House Lawyers | Corporate Counsel | Chief Executive Officers
Poll opened: 16 Mar 2019
Current jury pool: 37
Status: Voting in progress
Public Consensus Opinion
Voting options
  • House of Food Porn
  • Joe's Stone Crab
  • Truluck's
  • Zuma
RHUCoin reward
Vote: 15 RHU
Consensus bonus: 20 RHU
Total RHUCoin pool: 30,000 RHU
Eligibility: Resident of Miami | Visitor to Miami | Chef | Food Critic | Blogger
Poll opened: 12 Nov 2018
Poll closes: 30 Nov 2018
Current jury pool: 173
Status: Voting in progress
Public Consensus Opinion
Thankfully no one was hurt in email bomb incident, Im interested in the legal question of sending something that looks like a bomb but isn't.
  • Yes, it's a crime to send something threatening regardless of the intent
  • It would depend upon the intent of the sender
  • It's not a crime if it's an expression of free speech as long as it doesnt threaten or terrorize
  • It depends upon who the recepient is. If its a polical figure, its a crime. If it's your freind and its a joke, it's not a crime
  • If it would reasonably be viewed as a threat by the recepient it' a crime regardless of the intent of the sender
RHUCoin reward
Vote: 15 RHU
Consensus bonus: 20 RHU
Total RHUCoin pool: 7,500 RHU
Eligibility: Member of the public | ADR Professional (Alternative Dispute Resolution) | Arbitrator | Judge | Jury Expert | Law student / intern | Lawyer / Attorney | Blogger | The 500 Lawyers Group
Poll opened: 29 Oct 2018
Current jury pool: 219
Status: Voting in progress
Public Consensus Opinion
Iconic American brand Harley-Davidson has announced plans to begin manufacturing and selling its motorcycles in Europe. The decision is in response to a 31% EU tariff recently imposed on motorcycles, and Harley’s decision not to raise EU retail prices to cover the added expense. The plan anticipates European-made bikes being sold outside America, with bikes purchased in America continuing to be made in the U.S.A. The company, whose products were 100% American-made until 2014, currently has manufacturing operations in Brazil, India, and Australia, in addition to its three US facilities.
  • Yes. The company should do whatever is necessary, including offshore manufacturing, to continue to produce the best product at the lowest cost wherever in the world it is sold.
  • Yes—but only for local sale in the EU, not for resale in areas unaffected by high import tariffs on motorcycles.
  • Yes—as long as EU-produced bikes are registered and clearly marked “made in the EU” for consumer awareness.
  • No. Harley-Davidson should be taxed or penalized for moving manufacturing outside the USA.
  • No. To protect the long-term value of this uniquely American brand, Harley-Davidson motorcycles should be 100% made in the USA.
RHUCoin reward
Vote: 15 RHU
Consensus bonus: 15 RHU
Total RHUCoin pool: 15,000 RHU
Eligibility: Harley dealer | Harley employee/consultant | Harley rider – American | Harley rider – EU | Harley rider – other non-American | Member of public – American | Member of public – not American
Poll opened: 27 Jul 2018
Poll closes: 31 Aug 2018
Current jury pool: 366
Status: Voting in progress
RW vs. ADT Security Systems Inc.
Voting Results:
Poll opened: 30 Apr 2019
Poll closed on: 09 Sep 2019
Voters: 100
Total RHUCoin awarded: 2,320 RHU
Status: Closed
Should illegal aliens be allowed to vote in U.S. elections?
Voting Results:
Poll opened: 24 Jul 2018
Poll closed on: 31 Aug 2018
Voters: 288
Total RHUCoin awarded: 3,645 RHU
Status: Closed
Claimant vs. Testarossa Motors, League City, Texas
Voting Results:
View case on PeopleClaim
Poll opened: 05 Jun 2018
Poll closed on: 05 Jul 2018
Voters: 352
Total RHUCoin awarded: 3,445 RHU
Status: Closed
Should cryptocurrency be regulated as a security?
Voting Results:
Poll opened: 27 Apr 2018
Poll closed on: 05 Jun 2018
Voters: 1547
Total RHUCoin awarded: 24,515 RHU
Status: Closed

Important – Read before proceeding: Rhubarb provides a user platform for consensus answers / opinion from the public, industry experts, and community on a wide range of topics, including how to resolve disputes and answers to legal, technical, and other questions.

You understand and agree that nothing communicated on the site constitutes legal or professional advice, including all user posting, advocate suggestions, and consensus votes. Posting by legal and industry professionals is not professional advice and does not imply or constitute a legal, professional, or other fiduciary relationship between any of the participating parties.

Rhubarb and its members do not provide legal or professional advice or services. We are not a legal referral service. Rhubarb is not responsible for the accuracy of information posted on its site by members. Users are strongly advised to seek independent professional counsel before making decisions regarding cases or topics posted at Rhubarb.

You further agree to these and all other Terms of Service, and to hold Rhubarb harmless for your use of its services or for any decisions you may make based on its content or any content you post, including voting, suggestions, comments, or other content; and for mechanical or data failures, hacks, or other technical or critical features of the site.