Consensus verdicts

Public consensus verdicts rendered by rhucoin network

What is the best solution to America's healthcare cost crisis?
Public verdict: Medicare For All, with or without private insurance options (like BUPA in the UK) (Consensus 34% votes)
Case Type: Public Fairness Assessment
Initiated by: G.M.
Jury voters: 116
Total RHU rewarded: 790 RHU
Is Hillstone Restaurant Group, which includes Houston's, Hillstone, and R+D Kitchen, the worst company in America?
Public verdict: Hillstone Restaurant Group should provide masks to its staff and require them to wear them. (Consensus 47% votes)
Case Type: Public Fairness Assessment
Initiated by: M.W.
Jury voters: 55
Total RHU rewarded: 790 RHU
Should cryptocurrency be regulated as a security?
Public verdict: Yes (Consensus 55% votes)
Case Type: Dispute resolution
Initiated by: M.D.
Jury voters: 1547
Total RHU rewarded: 24,515 RHU
Claimant vs. Testarossa Motors, League City, Texas
Public verdict: Dealer should refund $5,266 to the customer and cover his cost of transportation while the car was out of service. (Consensus 32% votes)
View case on PeopleClaim
Case Type: Dispute resolution
Initiated by: M.D.
Jury voters: 352
Total RHU rewarded: 3,445 RHU
Customer vs. Stack Creations, Bangalore, India
Public verdict: Full refund of purchase price, $1,500 (Consensus 45% votes)
View case on PeopleClaim
Case Type: Dispute resolution
Initiated by: M.D.
Jury voters: 365
Total RHU rewarded: 4,830 RHU
Guest vs. Hyatt Place Louisville East
Public verdict: Hyatt should pay $771.97 in actual costs and time costs. (Consensus 23% votes)
View case on PeopleClaim
Case Type: Dispute resolution
Initiated by: M.D.
Jury voters: 355
Total RHU rewarded: 3,485 RHU
Taken for a ride by Uber
Public verdict: Create a complaint channel to deal effectively with all such complaints globally plus $1000 Uber credit for claimant (Consensus 28% votes)
View case on PeopleClaim
Case Type: Dispute resolution
Initiated by: M.D.
Jury voters: 393
Total RHU rewarded: 4,295 RHU
Should illegal aliens be allowed to vote in U.S. elections?
Public verdict: Never (Consensus 51% votes)
Case Type: Dispute resolution
Initiated by: G.R.
Jury voters: 288
Total RHU rewarded: 3,645 RHU
EP vs. Suttle Motors, Newport News, VA
Public verdict: Suttle Motors should repay the claimant for the extra $350 car rental he paid. (Consensus 75% votes)
Case Type: Dispute resolution
Initiated by: H.O.A.
Jury voters: 147
Total RHU rewarded: 735 RHU
Stiffed landlord vs. Michael J. Mondin
Public verdict: Michael J. Mondin should pay claimant settlement of $2,648 that he offered in February, plus $500 in interest charges incurred. Total settlement $3,148. (Consensus 45% votes)
Case Type: Dispute resolution
Initiated by: K.B.
Jury voters: 173
Total RHU rewarded: 1,015 RHU
Taken for a ride due to the fact that I recently had surgery and was recovering. Took advantage of my situation-illness.
Public verdict: TitleMax should credit you with the bank overdraft charges and check its system. I'm not clear as to how the duplicate payment was made - did the representative make it online for you, as well as you making it? A title loan company needs to be particularly careful about duplicate payments since its customers are likely short of cash, and any duplicate payment will probably create a shortfall in the customer's bank account, potentially leading to other payments bouncing. While the company wouldn't want to stop someone from making extra payments, an extra payment should trigger a notice: "You have already made a payment for this period. Are you sure you want to make another?" (Consensus 21% votes)
Case Type: Dispute resolution
Initiated by: J.J.
Jury voters: 101
Total RHU rewarded: 645 RHU
Phone owner vs robocalling National Health Agents
Public verdict: $1,500 in compensation, plus the name of its lead generation company that uses robocalling, if it's an outside company. (Consensus 50% votes)
View case on PeopleClaim
Case Type: Dispute resolution
Initiated by: S.T.
Jury voters: 175
Total RHU rewarded: 2,755 RHU
RW vs. ADT Security Systems Inc.
Public verdict: Yes (Consensus 91% votes)
Case Type: Dispute resolution
Initiated by: R.W.
Jury voters: 100
Total RHU rewarded: 2,320 RHU
Michael Robinson vs IMVU Inc.
Public verdict: Refund the amount I paid to you if you will not reinstate my accounts, since I cannot use the IMVU site. (Consensus 52% votes)
View case on PeopleClaim
Case Type: Dispute resolution
Initiated by: M.R.
Jury voters: 96
Total RHU rewarded: 1,920 RHU
What will be the future of ICOs?
Public verdict: ICOs will evolve and survive, and still be the dominant funding mechanism in 2020, because they’re both democratic and inclusive. (Consensus 29% votes)
Case Type: Prediction
Initiated by: M.D.
Jury voters: 242
Total RHU rewarded: 1,350 RHU
Which cryptocurrency will perform best in 2019?
Public verdict: Bitcoin (BTC) (Consensus 27% votes)
Case Type: Prediction
Initiated by: M.D.
Jury voters: 358
Total RHU rewarded: 4,335 RHU
What will the price of Bitcoin be in January, 2020?
Public verdict: Up (Consensus 92% votes)
Case Type: Prediction
Initiated by: A.S.
Jury voters: 160
Total RHU rewarded: 4,030 RHU
What will be the Stellar price be on January 1st, 2020 ?
Public verdict: between 0.30 and 1$ (Consensus 53% votes)
Case Type: Prediction
Initiated by: S.D.
Jury voters: 91
Total RHU rewarded: 1,755 RHU

Important – Read before proceeding: Rhubarb provides a user platform for consensus answers / opinion from the public, industry experts, and community on a wide range of topics, including how to resolve disputes and answers to legal, technical, and other questions.

You understand and agree that nothing communicated on the site constitutes legal or professional advice, including all user posting, advocate suggestions, and consensus votes. Posting by legal and industry professionals is not professional advice and does not imply or constitute a legal, professional, or other fiduciary relationship between any of the participating parties.

Rhubarb and its members do not provide legal or professional advice or services. We are not a legal referral service. Rhubarb is not responsible for the accuracy of information posted on its site by members. Users are strongly advised to seek independent professional counsel before making decisions regarding cases or topics posted at Rhubarb.

You further agree to these and all other Terms of Service, and to hold Rhubarb harmless for your use of its services or for any decisions you may make based on its content or any content you post, including voting, suggestions, comments, or other content; and for mechanical or data failures, hacks, or other technical or critical features of the site.