Public Fairness AssessmentTM
Initiated by: M.D.

Should Apple divorce case: Pay: compensate or take corrective action?

Case description
Case Title:
Apple Message Deletion Lawsuit

Claimant:
John Doe (anonymous UK businessman)

Respondent:
Apple Inc.⁠

Background

The claimant alleges that he exchanged messages with sex workers using Apple’s iMessage service. He subsequently deleted those messages from his iPhone and believed they had been permanently removed.

Several years later, his wife discovered copies of the messages on a linked Apple iMac computer. Following the discovery, the marriage ended in divorce.

The claimant argues that Apple’s deletion process was misleading because he believed the messages had been permanently deleted, when in fact they remained accessible on another synchronized Apple device.

The claimant seeks damages reportedly exceeding £5 million for divorce-related financial losses, legal expenses, and associated harm.

Claimant’s Arguments

1. Apple represented that messages were “deleted.”
2. A reasonable user would interpret “deleted” to mean permanently removed from all devices.
3. Apple failed to clearly disclose that messages could remain available on linked devices.
4. The lack of clear disclosure directly contributed to the discovery of the messages.
5. The claimant suffered substantial financial losses as a result.

Apple’s Likely Arguments

1. Users are responsible for understanding how synchronized cloud services work.
2. Linked-device message synchronization is a standard and widely disclosed feature.
3. The claimant’s own conduct—not Apple’s software—caused the marital breakdown.
4. Any damages are too remote and unforeseeable to be attributed to Apple.
5. The purpose of iMessage synchronization is to preserve messages across devices, not conceal them.
00 total voters

What happens next

Disputing parties will be invited to resolve the matter based on this public verdict. If the parties have agreed beforehand to use the results to arbitrate the case the verdict will be binding. If not, the results are nonbinding but can be used as input to guide further negotiation. Depending on the case, results may be distributed to other interested parties such as regulators and media.
RHU Supreme Court
Earnings
1.B.D.RHU 1,420
2.M.D.RHU 1,285
3.G.Y.RHU 1,180
4.G.F.D.RHU 830
5.N.N.RHU 800
6.L.Ş.RHU 770
7.B.L.RHU 745
8.I.K.RHU 740
9.N.K.RHU 740
10.L.C.RHU 731
Help promote justice and better decision — Earn RHU
Pick a case. See if you qualify for the jury. Vote.
Back