The 500 Lawyers Group invites you to vote on:
Description
Vote here: Are blockchain juries the future of law? E.g. if you had a billing dispute with a mechanic, which type of jury would you most trust to find the fairest resolution?
— Contributed by S.S.
Submit vote

Discussion

Show
Sort by
Comment:
Proposed solution: Palveshey Tariq, 10-14-2020
Have blockchain BE the (trustless, immutable, verifiable, P2P) legal system of the people by the people!
Reply: Sabrina Turner, 10-15-2020
'Law for the people, by the people' is a great war cry! I have had cases I couldn't pursue because of jurisdiction. Which one did you vote for? I'd have given my eye teeth to have a mixed jury of consumers and professionals when I had an insurance dispute and would have had to travel four hours each way to get to the right small claims court.
Proposed solution: Rob w, 10-02-2020
A jury of one-third each of (1) consumers, (2) independent auto mechanics and shop owners, and (3) consumer affairs lawyers
Reply: S T, 10-06-2020
Fair point. Although would the consumer affairs lawyers have more of an interest in spinning it out? Not sure.
Comment: Nour Mortada, 10-01-2020
Definitely! Especially in first instance courts. reduce time and cost, more accurate and unbiased! Legal professionals’ intervention remains essential For algorithm validation
Proposed solution: Nour Mortada, 10-01-2020
AI-powered dispute resolution solutions especially for low to medium value claims. As per Mullainthan experiment (artificial intelligence Decisions vs human judges bail judgments), AI system beat human by 25 %.
Reply: George Maxwell, 10-01-2020
Interesting! But do you think algorithmic juries will ever replace human juries?
Reply: Nour Mortada, 10-01-2020
Definitely! Especially in first instance courts. reduce time and cost, more accurate and unbiased! Legal professionals’ intervention remains essential For algorithm validation
Reply: Steve Watchell, 10-01-2020
I feel the same way about AI juries as I feel about private prisons. Possibly more efficient but an accused has a right to a jury of peers - not code
Comment: Alexandra Stimson, 09-29-2020
A local jury of 6 independent consumers and 6 auto mechanics
Reply: S T, 10-06-2020
that seems more like a regular, and very expensive, trial. Wouldn't you rather have large numbers?
Proposed solution: Svjatoslav Sedov, 08-04-2020
a blockchain juries of the whole world population rewarded by SVET coins
Proposed solution: Geoffrey Beresford Hartwell, 08-04-2020
A professional engineer as arbitrator (FAA 1925)
Comment: George Maxwell, 08-03-2020
No contest. I'm old. I don't want to spend the time and money going to court. That's old school even for me.
Comment: Barbara Donavon, 07-23-2020
I would prefer an online jury with mechanics and consumers because it would be so much quicker and cheaper. I can't imagine anything other than small claims court (no jury) for a billing dispute anyway, but even so, small claims costs at least $100 and takes up a lot of time.
Reply: Steve Watchell, 10-01-2020
Agree. Small claims are often unfair and the panels are often uninformed about the subject matter. I’d trust a jury of insiders as long as they didn’t have an industry bias
Reply: S T, 10-06-2020
That's why I'd go with a 50/50 jury; knowledge plus skepticism.